Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
The Canadian Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Canadian Mineralogist; June 2007; v. 45; no. 3; p. 503-508; DOI: 10.2113/gscanmin.45.3.503
© 2007 Mineralogical Association of Canada
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linthout, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

TRIPARTITE DIVISION OF THE SYSTEM 2REEPO4 – CaTh(PO4)2 – 2ThSiO4, DISCREDITATION OF BRABANTITE, AND RECOGNITION OF CHERALITE AS THE NAME FOR MEMBERS DOMINATED BY CaTh(PO4)2

Kees Linthout§

Institute for Geo- and Bioarchaeology, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

§ E-mail address: k2.linthout{at}ext.vu.nl

La nomenclature de phases dans le système 2REEPO4 – CaTh(PO4)2 – 2ThSiO4 a été révisée afin d’être conforme aux principes de la Commission de Nouveaux Minéraux et des Noms de Minéraux. Dorénavant, seuls trois noms seront appliqués, monazite, chéralite et huttonite, selon la composante dominante. Le terme chéralite a priorité sur "brabantite", qui se trouve donc discrédité. Le diagramme à six divisions est remplacé par un diagramme de nomenclature à trois divisions qui est conforme aux règles de l’IMA. Les paramètres de la chéralite sont redéfinis. Cette soumission, IMA 2005/F, a été approuvée par la Commission en avril, 2006.

(Traduit par la Rédaction)

Mots-clés: monazite, chéralite, huttonite, "brabantite", classification, nomenclature, discréditation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Can MineralHome page
F. Hatert and E. A.J. Burke
THE IMA-CNMNC DOMINANT-CONSTITUENT RULE REVISITED AND EXTENDED
Can Mineral, June 1, 2008; 46(3): 717 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mineral MagHome page
Y. H. Dawood and H. H. A. El-Naby
Mineral chemistry of monazite from the black sand deposits, northern Sinai, Egypt: a provenance perspective
Mineralogical Magazine, August 1, 2007; 71(4): 389 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linthout, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Association of Canada