Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Canadian Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Canadian Mineralogist; August 2007; v. 45; no. 4; p. 865-873; DOI: 10.2113/gscanmin.45.4.865
© 2007 Mineralogical Association of Canada
This Article
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Griffen, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

CRYSTALLOGRAPHICALLY ORIENTED POLYPHASE RODS IN RED WILLEMITE FROM FRANKLIN, NEW JERSEY

Kasia Harper Johnson and Dana T. Griffen

Department of Geological Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, U.S.A.

§ E-mail address: dana_griffen{at}byu.edu

The color of red willemite (Zn2SiO4) from Franklin, New Jersey, has been attributed in the past to inclusions of franklinite. We have examined these inclusions, which are rod-shaped and 5–20 µm in diameter, and found them to contain multiple phases. Polarized-light microscopy shows the rods to be oriented uniformly parallel to the c axis of willemite, and to have hexagonal or pseudohexagonal cross-sections. Phases identified by standardless EDS analysis and electron back-scatter diffraction include franklinite, friedelite, zincian kutnohorite, serpentine and rhodonite, as well as a sparse, unidentified K-bearing phase. Possible explanations for the origin of the rods include exsolution, primary fluid inclusions, and epitactic growth contemporaneous with willemite crystallization. Although rod-like exsolution is known in some geological settings, and an original exsolved phase might have been altered to the present assemblage, some of the elements in that assemblage (e.g., H, C, Cl, K, and Ca) are incompatible with the willemite structure at any temperature. An origin as fluid inclusions is supported by the shapes of the rods (i.e., negative crystals with a hexagonal cross-sections), the presence of phases containing OH, Cl, Ca, K, and CO3, and void space visible around solid phases. The tapered shapes of the rods seems inconsistent with epitaxy. We suggest that willemite-generating metasomatic fluids were preserved as inclusions rich in elements incompatible with willemite, and that subsequent conditions led to their crystallization, possibly by reaction with the host. Reaction ceased with complete consumption of the fluid, resulting in relict fluid inclusions that impart color on the macro scale.

Keywords: willemite, inclusions, electron back-scatter diffraction, Franklin, New Jersey.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Association of Canada