|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Articles |

Institute for Geo- and Bioarchaeology, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
E-mail address: k2.linthout{at}ext.vu.nl
The nomenclature for the system 2REEPO4 – CaTh(PO4)2 – 2ThSiO4 has been revised, to be consistent with CNMMN principles. Henceforth, only three names will be applied to members dominated by the respective end-member compositions monazite, cheralite, and huttonite. The name cheralite has priority over brabantite, which hereby is discredited. A six-fold diagram is replaced by a three-fold nomenclature diagram to conform to IMA rules. The parameters of cheralite are redefined. This proposal, IMA 2005/F, was approved by the CNMMN in April 2006.
Keywords: monazite, cheralite, huttonite, "brabantite", classification, nomenclature, discreditation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Hatert and E. A.J. Burke THE IMA-CNMNC DOMINANT-CONSTITUENT RULE REVISITED AND EXTENDED Can Mineral, June 1, 2008; 46(3): 717 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. H. Dawood and H. H. A. El-Naby Mineral chemistry of monazite from the black sand deposits, northern Sinai, Egypt: a provenance perspective Mineralogical Magazine, August 1, 2007; 71(4): 389 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |