Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Canadian Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Canadian Mineralogist; April 2007; v. 45; no. 2; p. 229-237; DOI: 10.2113/gscanmin.45.2.229
© 2007 Mineralogical Association of Canada
This Article
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

TOURMALINE: STRUCTURAL FORMULA CALCULATIONS

Christine M. Clark§

Department of Geography and Geology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan 48197, USA

§ E-mail address: christine.clark{at}emich.edu

The results of chemical analyses of tourmaline are usually incomplete owing to difficulties in dealing with the light elements, valence states of transition metals, and problems with the heterogeneity of crystals. Where there are undetermined components, assumptions must be made in order to develop a structural formula. The normalization procedures for tourmaline-group minerals have been compared to determine which schemes provide the most accurate formula in cases where there is a lack of information. The normalization on 31 anions, assuming OH values if necessary, produces a more useful formula than schemes that ignore F or B. Iteration of Li may give a first approximation of Li content; Li2O may be added to the calculations until Y + Z + T = 15 apfu. Care should be taken with all assumptions; the common assumption that all iron is ferrous and OH + F = 4 apfu can result in the misidentification of buergerite as "fluor-schorl". Ultimately, as many data should be collected as possible, including information on the structure, Fe3+/Fe2+ value, and Li and H contents.

Keywords: tourmaline, normalization, formula calculation, schorl, buergerite.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Can MineralHome page
S. Demirel, M. C. Goncuoglu, G. Topuz, and V. Isik
GEOLOGY AND CHEMICAL VARIATIONS IN TOURMALINE FROM THE QUARTZ-TOURMALINE BRECCIAS WITHIN THE KERKENEZ GRANITE-MONZONITE MASSIF, CENTRAL ANATOLIAN CRYSTALLINE COMPLEX, TURKEY
Can Mineral, August 1, 2009; 47(4): 787 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mineral MagHome page
A. Pesquera, F. Torres, P. Gil-Crespo, and J. Torres-Ruiz
TOURCOMP: A program for estimating end-member proportions in tourmalines
Mineralogical Magazine, March 18, 2009; 72(5): 1021 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Association of Canada