Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Résumé Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ercit, T. S. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

IDENTIFICATION AND ALTERATION TRENDS OF GRANITIC-PEGMATITE-HOSTED (Y,REE,U,Th)–(Nb,Ta,Ti) OXIDE MINERALS: A STATISTICAL APPROACH

T. Scott Ercit

Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada

E-mail address: sercit{at}mus-nature.ca

The (Y,REE,U,Th)–(Nb,Ta,Ti) oxide minerals in REE-enriched granitic pegmatite and A- and I-type granites are primarily comprised of the fergusonite, samarskite, euxenite, aeschynite and pyrochlore groups. They are typically metamict and altered, and can be difficult to identify on a structural basis (XRD); consequently, examination of sample composition may be the most reliable approach to their identification. Canonical discriminant analysis can be used to discriminate among the various groups, and to assess the style and degree of alteration affecting samples. Identification of individual species should be made on the basis of previously published guidelines or, in their absence, on the basis of the "50% rule" of the IMA. Vector analysis shows that alteration typically pushes the compositions of samarskite-, euxenite- and aeschynite-group minerals in a direction that causes them to resemble pyrochlore-group minerals. For this reason, it has been historically difficult to determine the exact nature of "viethofingite", "hjelmite" and "ampangabeite"; all are shown to be altered varieties of samarskite-group minerals. Yttrotantalite-(Y) is shown to be a member of the samarskite group, not the fergusonite group.

Keywords: statistical analysis, classification, pyrochlore, samarskite, fergusonite, euxenite, aeschynite, yttrotantalite-(Y), "viethofingite", "hjelmite", "ampangabeite", granitic pegmatite.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Guastoni, V. Diella, and F. Pezzotta VIGEZZITE AND ASSOCIATED OXIDES OF Nb-Ta FROM EMERALD-BEARING PEGMATITES OF THE VIGEZZO VALLEY, WESTERN ALPS, ITALY Can Mineral, June 1, 2008; 46(3): 619 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Slack, J. N. Aleinikoff, H. E. Belkin, C. M. Fanning, and P. W. Ransom MINERAL CHEMISTRY AND SHRIMP U-Pb GEOCHRONOLOGY OF MESOPROTEROZOIC POLYCRASE-TITANITE VEINS IN THE SULLIVAN Pb-Zn-Ag DEPOSIT, BRITISH COLUMBIA Can Mineral, April 1, 2008; 46(2): 361 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Bermanec, N. Tomasic, G. Kniewald, M. E. Back, and G. Zagler NIOBOAESCHYNITE-(Y), A NEW MEMBER OF THE AESCHYNITE GROUP FROM THE BEAR LAKE DIGGINGS, HALIBURTON COUNTY, ONTARIO, CANADA Can Mineral, April 1, 2008; 46(2): 395 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. B. Simmons, W. B. Simmons, S. L. Hanson, and A. U. Falster SAMARSKITE-(Yb): A NEW SPECIES OF THE SAMARSKITE GROUP FROM THE LITTLE PATSY PEGMATITE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO Can Mineral, October 1, 2006; 44(5): 1119 - 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]