Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Canadian Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Canadian Mineralogist; August 2005; v. 43; no. 4; p. 1171-1181; DOI: 10.2113/gscanmin.43.4.1171
© 2005 Mineralogical Association of Canada
This Article
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Grant, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

DEHYDRATION AND CRYSTALLIZATION REACTIONS OF SECONDARY SULFATE MINERALS FOUND IN MINE WASTE: IN SITU POWDER-DIFFRACTION EXPERIMENTS

Ronald C. Peterson§ and Alan H. Grant

Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada

§ E-mail address: peterson{at}geol.queensu.ca

A sample stage and a control system have been developed to vary the humidity and temperature of the atmosphere surrounding a powder sample during an X-ray-diffraction experiment. The use of this stage and a position-sensitive detector creates the opportunity to conduct experiments that determine the stability fields and reaction mechanisms of related sulfates of different states of hydration, such as melanterite, siderotil and rozenite. The sample is dusted onto a zero-background plate, and this small amount of dispersed sample ensures maximum interaction among all of the crystallites of the sample and the atmosphere. Determination of the phase boundary for the dehydration of melanterite to rozenite is compared to that determined by Chou et al.(2002). The rate of dehydration of cuprian melanterite to cuprian siderotil is shown to depend on the relative humidity in the chamber, which is consistent with a diffusion-controlled process. Rozenite is observed to form by very rapid dehydration of cuprian melanterite. The crystallization of melanterite from liquid under controlled humidity is demonstrated.

Keywords: powder X-ray diffraction, melanterite, siderotil, rozenite, relative humidity, dehydration.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Can MineralHome page
J. L. Anderson, R. C. Peterson, and I. P. Swainson
THE ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND HYDROGEN BONDING OF DEUTERATED MELANTERITE, FeSO4{middle dot}7D2O
Can Mineral, June 1, 2007; 45(3): 457 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Association of Canada