Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Canadian Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Canadian Mineralogist; October 1996; v. 34; no. 5; p. 991-999
© 1996 Mineralogical Association of Canada
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Yakovenchuk, V. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

"Nioboloparite"; a re-investigation and discreditation

Roger H. Mitchell, Anton R. Chakhmouradian, and Viktor N. Yakovenchuk

Lakehead University, Department of Geology, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
St. Petersburg State University, Russian Federation
Geological Institute, Russian Federation

A study of "nioboloparite" samples from the Khibina massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia, demonstrates that the majority is merely calcian niobian loparite-(Ce), niobian calcian loparite-(Ce) or niobian loparite-(Ce). The minerals do not differ in structure or significantly, with respect to their composition, from common loparite-(Ce) that occurs as a primary mineral throughout the Khibina complex. They differ from common loparite-(Ce) in that they are zoned from a Nb-enriched core to a margin enriched in rare-earth elements and depleted in Nb. This zonation trend is the opposite of that developed during crystallization of primary loparite and is considered to reflect reaction of primary relatively Nb-rich loparite with late-stage REE-enriched fluids. One sample of "nioboloparite" from a pegmatite vein in ijolite-urtite is a lanthanian lueshite characterized by enrichment of La over Ce. The term "nioboloparite" does not correspond to a distinct mineral species and must be discredited.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Association of Canada