Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Canadian Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Canadian Mineralogist; October 1996; v. 34; no. 5; p. 1051-1057
© 1996 Mineralogical Association of Canada
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oberti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Soto, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Crystal-structure refinement of a highly ordered staurolite

Roberta Oberti, Frank C. Hawthorne, Alberto Zanetti, Luisa Ottolini, and Juan I. Soto

CNR, Centro di Studio Per la Cristallochimica e la Cristallografia, Pavia, Italy

The crystal structure of zinc-rich staurolite, Zn 240 Fe (sub 1.41) Mg (sub 1.27) Mn (sub 0.01) Ni (sub 0.01) Ti (sub 0.09) Li (sub 0.01) Cr (sub 0.02) Al (sub 16.80) Si (sub 7.99) O 45 (OH) 3 , a 7.877(3), b 16.609(5), c 5.665(1) Aa, beta 90.68(2) degrees , V 741.0 Aa 3 , Z = 1, from the Nevado-Filabride complex, Lubrin, Almeria province, Spain, has been refined to an R index of 2.0% based on 986 observed reflections collected with MoKalpha X-radiation. This crystal is poor in Al, as reflected in the high Si content and the large amount of [6]-coordinated Mg. The beta value is the largest yet measured for staurolite, and is slightly larger than the maximum beta -angle predicted for staurolite (Hawthorne et al. 1993b). Site-scattering refinement shows that the M(3) cations are highly, but not completely, ordered: Q (sub M(3)) [= (X (sub M(3A)) -X (sub M(3B)) )/(X (sub M(3A)) +X (sub M(3B)) )] is equal to 0.89, rather than to the value of 1.0 expected for the beta angle of this crystal. However, the refined M(3A) and M(3B) site-scattering values are compatible with complete order of Al at M(3A) but disorder of Mg over M(3A) and M(3B). The results of this work quantitatively support the order-disorder model for staurolite proposed by Hawthorne et al. (1993b), but suggest that the quantitative details can be affected by the presence of [6]-coordinated Mg because it behaves differently from [6]-coordinated Al.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
C. CHOPIN, B. GOFFE, L. UNGARETTI, and R. OBERTI
Magnesiostaurolite and zincostaurolite: mineral description with a petrogenetic and crystal-chemical update
European Journal of Mineralogy, February 1, 2003; 15(1): 167 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Association of Canada